• Tweet

  • Mail service

  • Share

  • Save

  • Get PDF

  • Buy Copies

  • Impress

In these difficult times, nosotros've made a number of our coronavirus manufactures free for all readers. To become all of HBR'southward content delivered to your inbox, sign upwardly for the Daily Alert newsletter.

Businesses, universities, and entire communities are realizing that while the Covid-19 pandemic continues, testing whole populations may be necessary to resume in-person interaction without uncontrolled outbreaks. "Assurance testing," every bit we call it, faces novel challenges and requires a novel strategy: Online marketplaces for testing that make it simpler and cheaper for organizations and communities of any size to get their members tested while making it efficient for labs and exam administrators to make tests available when and where they are needed.

The Daunting Challenge

The economist Paul Romer was among the earliest to recognize that universal testing could enable groups to work, live, and socialize together without causing outbreaks of Covid-xix. In attempting to resume activities where social distancing is difficult or infeasible, some businesses, universities, and other organizations — fifty-fifty towns — have sought to deploy universal testing anywhere from daily to weekly to but a single occurrence (to confirm they accept little or no disease).

Consequently, assurance testing requires far greater scale than medical testing (which is used to brand a diagnosis for people with symptoms or a loftier-risk exposure such as close contact with an infected person) and surveillance testing (which is used to track at-risk subgroups for signs of spread).

Further Reading

Given the much larger calibration, repurposing existing medical and surveillance testing infrastructure probably would not suffice even in countries with single-payer systems and extensive public testing capacity. Building an acceptable capacity in the The states, with its multi-payer, overwhelmingly private health care organisation, will be an even greater claiming. Simply if done correct, the increased volume and predictability of assurance testing could help lower testing costs, increase innovation, and provide wider, more equitable access.

Today organizations that wish to provide assurance testing require significant resources to not only buy testing but besides to figure out whom to test and how ofttimes, and to constitute the complex logistics and contracting required with testing organizations, labs, and others (building managers, tent companies, clinical staffing, etc.). While big, well-resourced entities can organize bespoke solutions (such as creating their ain bulldoze-up testing site), the loftier cost and lack of scalability get out smaller entities without feasible solutions, which increases vulnerability for everyone in a community.

Meanwhile, testing companies, academy labs, and hospitals that could add together much needed capacity to the arrangement find it cumbersome to contract and set up billing arrangements with all the organizations needing tests and to plant local testing sites. Without visibility into time to come volumes they are non able to optimize investments in increasing capacity and driving innovation.

This is a archetype many-to-many problem. At that place are many organizations and communities that demand tests, and there are many organizations involved in delivering tests. And nosotros lack a machinery to bridge this many-to-many complexity.

The Solution: Online Marketplaces

Romer has suggested that the federal regime simply pay for the entire population to get tested at an appropriate frequency. He argues compellingly that the cost to do this is far lower than the damage to the economy without testing. Others have suggested that city or state governments or interstate compacts tin negotiate majority pricing. Right now, it's a mix of individual and public sources. But regardless of who is paying, there is a need for a platform to enable organizations throughout a community (whether employers, schools, nursing homes, or neighborhoods) to obtain tests and contract in a transparent and standardized mode.

The reality of organizing testing today is that exam sites and buyers are local. But a marketplace with wide borough participation that ties local needs to national capacity would allow buyers of tests of any size, testing labs, and testing site operators to notice and contract with each other.

Such a marketplace would complement efforts by national firms (such equally commercial labs and retail pharmacies) that offering testing solutions to large organizations and at retail sites. It would help bulldoze down the cost of testing through scale, transparency, and efficiency. It would facilitate the rapid adoption of innovations in technologies (e.m., new kinds of tests), processes (e.yard., pooled testing), and business organization models (due east.g., prepaid and subscriptions). Information technology would accommodate different funding approaches (eastward.g., employer paid, public coverage, philanthropy, or "charitable commerce" such as buy-ane-give-one models). Finally, it would go a long way towards achieving the level of coverage that many locales need even if there is insufficient public testing.

Insight Center

  • Health Intendance and the Pandemic

    Sponsored by Medtronic

    Leading through the Covid-19 Crunch.

The claiming for creating such marketplaces is they require a critical mass of buyers and suppliers to go going, a quintessential craven-and-egg problem. Local leaders, nevertheless, could kickstart them by making seed investments and committing their personal names and institutional brands to the efforts. The requirements of current diagnostic testing likely make establishing a single national or international marketplace infeasible. But as engineering evolves and feel with such marketplaces accumulates, they could extend to serve larger geographies and communities.

Regardless of scale, a successful market place for testing has six essential components.

1. Testing labs. To go off the ground, the marketplace needs at least one initial test-lab partner. At that place are incentives for labs to want to bring together the marketplace: Information technology will enable local hospitals, academic centers, and commercial labs with untapped high-throughput lab capacity to efficiently find buyers and manage the logistics efficiently. Information technology will provide prepayment and guaranteed volumes that will accelerate investment by players. And it volition create a pathway for them to introduce new testing technology in markets.

two. Arranged products and services. The marketplace needs bundled products and services that are easy for organizations and communities to purchase. For case, it should offer unlike subscription packages, each of which provides a certain number of tests per student, employee, or customs member. It needs an business relationship managing director to market the service and manage the billing and other services relating to buyers of tests.

3. Network of test site administrators. The platform needs a critical mass of partners who tin run test sites. This could include anyone from big national chains with many retail locations to local ambulance companies or health providers that tin can establish walk-in or drive-upwards locations on need.

four. Standardized contracts and checklists. Currently, organizations seeking testing must all struggle through numerous operational and legal details. Each ane is having to work through arrangements with an array of entities such as landlords, tent companies, and even cities. The marketplace can simplify processes and contracts through templates, checklists, and other means of sharing best practices.

v. Enabling software and logistics management. The market needs software that can efficiently manage: how buyers of tests and suppliers can find each other; how tests are purchased and funds flows are managed; how admission to tests sites or deliveries of tests are secured; how members are identified and tracked; how a doctor order for each examination is obtained (a common legal requirement nosotros think should be removed); and how information — including test results — is fabricated available in real time to patients, sponsors, and the state (for contact tracing and surveillance). Equally test technology changes, the details will change (east.one thousand., self-administered home testing will require different logistics and data systems from the samples collected at a walk-upwards location). Simply the market place will still likely be needed to provide organizations and communities with options, including for the logistics of getting examination kits to testing sites or directly to users and the samples back to the lab.

6. Supportive government actions. The public sector has an important role to play in ensuring equity in provision of testing to all communities and accelerating the pace at which such marketplaces are scaled up. Local, state, or national governments can do this as heir-apparent of tests (for populations and public employees), as a supplier of publicly run testing sites and labs (offering a public option that provides a pricing reference point on the platform), or as the operator of a marketplace.

Governments should also support the adoption of assurance testing by promoting guidelines for such testing and providing organizations that follow these guidelines a safety-harbor from lawsuits relating to Covid-nineteen infections in order to provide a meaningful incentive for organizations to test their members at the appropriate frequency. Public agencies tin also approve cheaper, lower-sensitivity tests for frequently-repeated assurance testing and encourage approved group testing strategies (initially pooling samples from several people in one exam to reduce costs). It would also be beneficial to allow "continuing orders" that remove the need for a split up physician order for each examination like those issued by many governments to allow the opioid-reversal drug naloxone to be dispensed without a doctor'south prescription.

Assurance testing can be a critical lever to reopen economies and it is imperative that business and borough leaders come together to establish marketplaces that provide the elements to attain the necessary scale.

If our content helps you to contend with coronavirus and other challenges, please consider subscribing to HBR. A subscription purchase is the best way to back up the creation of these resources.